On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:09:07 -0800 "Steve T."
<mixednutspress@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Dec 26, 2003, at 4:06 PM, Michael A Chase wrote:
Actually, Holmes would have approved. He believed in retaining nothing
that wasn't useful in his work.
Granted. But Jupiter didn't even know who Holmes was.
But if I read the exchange correctly, she did know who Moriarty was.
Calling him just a math teacher is understating things though.
In any case, I think this Usagi is one of those people who believe that
there's no such thing as useless information.
This Usagi is a special case. Even when her doubletalk drove the schrink
out the window, it was probably all scientifically sound.