Subject: Re: [FFML] [rant/spam] The Great C&C Debate - Part II
From: "Philip Hacker" <prohackr@hotmail.com>
Date: 12/16/1998, 10:24 AM
To: ffml@fanfic.com



<< Are you saying that the incident with Petes-kun and Lurker is
commonplace?  I really can't say that I've seen too many incidents
like this.  In fact, in my experience, destructive C&C is far more
common.  (Have we all forgotten about Gubby? :) >>
	Gotta say this: If you ask me, nonexsistant/invisable C&C has got to 
be the
most common.

I can deal with negative C&C, but it should be directed at the story, 
not the writer. Insluting the writer personally does no good.

Phil

prohackr@hotmail.com


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com