On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Guy Under The Bridge . wrote:

This is silly.  There is not *one* act that defines sanity or insanity.
Rather, a series of actions suggests a trends.  I can name many, many
actions by Kodachi that suggest a trend of mental instability.

Anyone can come up with any number of actions to suggest a plethora of 
trends that can be used to color every character in the series with 
every bizarre characterization under the sun.

Let's see you come up with a trend for stability then.

The onus is on *you* to prove your bizarre view of Kodachi, not for me 
to disprove it.

NO, of course not.  It's on you!  YOU SAY HIS IS WRONG.  Prove it.

I noticed that you didn't answer this question either.  Care to try, or 

will

you ignore it yet again?

My problem was not with Nabiki being interested in money, but with this 
bizarre 'huntress' Nabiki that feeds off of terror.

"You keep saying that word.  I do not think it means what you think it
means."

This is CANON.

Nabiki can't control how far Ranma will fly off the handle. If he had 
simply swallowed his pride, nothing would have happened to him; instead, 
he tried to fight Nabiki, and he lost. And Ranma was not reduced to a 
'mental wreck', he was simply subjected to petty blackmail, which is the 
extent of how far Nabiki will carry things. She could really hurt 
someone, but she's not that kind of character.

Yes, she IS.