On Mon, 15 Dec 1997, Tetsuo Ruxpin wrote:

No, seriously, though... Ranma 1/2, in my opinion, wasn't really meant to
be that serious of a series... which accounts, for instance, for the
inconsistencies in things like the cursed springs. (i.e.: Does the person
turn into a different version of himself, or into an exact copy of the old
form? Wasn't there a Spring of Drowned Akane at one point?) So, questions
like this are really a little pointless to debate, in my opinion. n.n

Thank you.  It needed to be said.

You're welcome. And thanks you. :)
 

Ranma's height is about as consistant as his (femal) measurements, which
while always somewhat of an hourglas shape, seem to change to fit the scene,
seemingly without any outside influence.  It's part of what makes the whole
thing so darn silly and fun.  Kinda like the wide range inconsistancies in
Star Trek. (and in my spelling)

Yup. i.e.: Sailor Moon is a thing about which you can debate "canonity". 
Macross is. Tenchi is.  Ranma is not. :) It's just not -meant- that way.
;)


"Common Sense is what tells you that the Earth is flat."
Adam Conover
dconover@garnet.acns.fsu.edu
http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~dconover/main.html
  /\
 /()\   Fnord.
/    \
------