RPM - acct 3/5 wrote:
It's still quite raw, so feel free to correct me
on characterization, aesthetics, plot, NOT SPELLING
(that's what spellcheckers are for, later),
Two points:
Why aren't spellcheckers for that, sooner?
And why not point out spelling errors? Will a spellchecker catch "its"
for "it's" or "their" for "there"?
Why limit what kind of C&C you get? Personally, I appreciate people
pointing out my mechanical errors. I have an on-the-fly spell checker
built into Word97, and stuff still slips by.
-rodM