Subject: Re: Value of C&C (was Re: [FFML] Another message...)
From: Sean Connor
Date: 8/22/1998, 11:54 PM
To: skeezy5@geocities.com
CC: "ffml@fanfic.com" <ffml@fanfic.com>

On Sat, Aug 22, 1998 at 08:55:50PM -0400, skeezy5 wrote:
	For example, a few weeks back, I received two fairly extensive
C&C's from Blade and Sean Connor.  Blade had worded his rather neutrally,
while I had felt that Sean's was a bit hostile.  Though both basically
covered the same point - that I wasn't as familiar with Ukyou as I had
thought - my reaction to the two C&C's was vastly different.  Even though 
they were pointing out the exact same problems in many cases.
	I kinda wrangled with Sean for a while about it, but now that I
think it over, I was the one being rude.  He had been very frank and 
honest in his opinions, and I should have thanked him for it instead of
getting peeved.  If you're reading this Sean, I guess I'm giving you a
late apology.

Well, in that case, apology accepted.  I suppose I should apologise to
you, as well, as I was a lot harder on you than I should have been.  I
was rather frustrated by real-life circumstances at the time, and I
was wrong to let that spill over into my C&C of your work.

-- -Sean Connor (sec@softhome.net) The day Microsoft produces something that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners.